- Criminal Defense lawyers
- Misdemeanor Criminal Defense lawyers
- Felony Criminal Defense lawyers
- Criminal Appeal lawyers
- Child Pornography lawyers
- Abogado Penalista lawyers
- Parental Liability lawyers
- Reckless Driving and Speeding Tickets lawyers
- Probation Violations lawyers
- Post-Conviction Relief Expungement lawyers
- Assault & Battery lawyers
- Assault and Battery Defense lawyers
- Assault and Battery Overview lawyers
- Domestic Violence Overview lawyers
- Domestic Violence Sentencing lawyers
- Domestic Battery and Spousal Abuse lawyers
- Felony Domestic Violence lawyers
- Domestic Violence Arrest lawyers
- Domestic Assault lawyers
- Grand Jury in Drug Cases lawyers
- Drug Possession lawyers
- Drugs lawyers
- Federal Drug Charges lawyers
- Drug Charge Defense lawyers
- Federal Drug Charges Overview lawyers
- Drunk Driving DUI Overview lawyers
- DUI Defense lawyers
- DUI OUI lawyers
- Felony DUI and Drunk Driving Defense lawyers
- DUI Breathalyzer Test lawyers
- Drunk Driving and Auto Insurance lawyers
- Drugs Searches and Seizures lawyers
- DUI and DWI lawyers
- Identity Theft lawyers
- Federal Criminal Defense lawyers
- Federal Crimes lawyers
- Federal Grand Jury Defense lawyers
- Internet Crime lawyers
- Internet Crime Overview lawyers
- Internet Fraud Recovery lawyers
- Internet Crime Defense lawyers
- Juvenile Defense lawyers
- Juvenile Defense lawyers
- Juvenile Matters Overview lawyers
- Juvenile Crime Defense lawyers
- Sex Offenses Overview lawyers
- Sexual Assault lawyers
- Sexual Assault Rape lawyers
- Sex Crime Defense lawyers
- Sex Offenses Nonviolent lawyers
- Sexual Offenses False Allegations lawyers
- Sex Crime Defense lawyers
- Sex Crimes lawyers
- Traffic Violations Overview lawyers
- Traffic Offenses lawyers
- Traffic Violation Stop lawyers
- Traffic Stop Search and Seizure lawyers
- Violent Crime Defense lawyers
- Defense for Licensed Professionals lawyers
- White Collar Crimes Insider Trading lawyers
- White Collar Crime Penalties lawyers
- Financial Crime Defense lawyers
- White Collar Crime Overview lawyers
- Money Laundering and Fraud Defense lawyers
- Fraud lawyers
- Sitemap
- Resource Links
WWAN Referral Network
If your firm wishes to join our growing network, us with the contact form to let us know.
Indiana Area Codes Available
219, 260, 574
Indiana Area Codes Taken
317, 765, 812
Indianapolis DUI Breathalyzer Test lawyers
Challenging the Reliability of Breathalyzer Test Results
In all drunk driving cases, the prosecution must prove that the defendant's blood alcohol concentration at the time of the offense was at or above a statutory limit. In many states, the limit is .10 percent, but in others it is .08, and there is a national movement afoot to make .08 the limit in all states. In order to prove the requisite level of alcohol in the blood of someone arrested for drunk driving, it is necessary to obtain a suitable sample of the arrestee's blood, urine, or hair at the time of arrest. The use of a breath test is by far the most popular scientific method for establishing that drunk driving has occurred. Some defendants have been able to challenge the results of such tests in court successfully, thereby preventing a conviction. An attorney experienced in drunk driving defense law is in a strong position to advise a client whether the "Breathalyzer" test results may be subject to challenge in his or her particular case.
For more information about Challenging the Reliability of Breathalyzer Test Results, contact the Indiana DUI defense Law Offices of Tony Zirkle for a free consultation.
Breath Test Results Can Be Challenged on Several Bases
The breath test for drunk driving involves measuring the amount of alcohol in an appropriate sample of exhaled air. While the test is quite simple to perform, the use of breath tests to determine blood alcohol suffers from a major and fundamental weakness in that it is an "indirect method" and thus subject to variability. The temperature, the atmospheric pressure, the chemical composition of the alleged offender's blood, his or her physical activity, and hyperventilation are just some of the factors that can lead to variable, and thus arguably questionable, results. Some courts have allowed drunk driving defendants to present expert testimony of the scientific inaccuracy of Breathalyzer test results based on these inherent variables.
Test results can also be challenged on the basis of the circumstances of the particular testing at issue, including the skill and experience of the tester and the quality of the particular equipment used. Breath testing machines are also subject to error when the person being tested has been recently exposed to fumes, such as lacquer, paint, gasoline, or dry cleaning fluids. Although some courts have demonstrated a willingness to accept challenges to blood alcohol test results on many grounds, others are more selective and generally appear to accept the test results at face value. An experienced drunk driving attorney knows which challenges are likely to be accepted in local courts and which are not.
In some states and under certain circumstances, breath test results may not be admissible at all, such as when the arresting officer fails to give the required implied consent warning. Such a warning is not always required, however, and is simply written into the drunk driving statute; in those states, consent to testing is implied by everyone with a driver's license. If the Breathalyzer results are inadmissible for any reason, the prosecutor will have to prove the case based on other evidence, such as the results of field-sobriety tests, if given, or other eyewitness testimony. Without scientific evidence, however, the prosecutor's case loses much of its clout and the defendant stands a better chance of the charges being dropped.
Conclusion
Many people wrongly assume that if they blow an above the limit reading on a Breathalyzer they are as good as convicted of drunk driving, but that is not always the case. In some cases, the results of Breathalyzer tests can be challenged on general scientific grounds, and in others, the circumstances of the particular test can be brought into question, raising a reasonable doubt about the drunk driving defendant's guilt. A skilled and knowledgeable drunk driving lawyer can explain what challenges are appropriate in a particular case and possibly even keep the test results out of court entirely.
For more information about Challenging the Reliability of Breathalyzer Test Results, contact the Indiana DUI defense Law Offices of Tony Zirkle for a free consultation.
Let our Indianapolis DUI Breathalyzer Test lawyers help you!
DUI Breathalyzer Test » Divorce & Family Attorneys and Lawyers Serving Lake Co., Marion Co. and St. Joseph Co. Indiana
Lawfirm@worldwideattorney.com
317.572.7717 Bloomington
317.572.7717 Carmel
317.572.7717 Crown Point
317.572.7717 Elkhart
317.572.7717 Fort Wayne
317.572.7717 Gary
317.572.7717 Hammond
317.572.7717 Indianapolis
317.572.7717 Kokomo
317.572.7717 Merrillville
317.572.7717 Mishawaka
317.572.7717 Muster
317.572.7717 South Bend
317.572.7717 Valparaiso
317.572.7717 West Lafayette
Indianapolis Metro Crime Report Trends
Information from the FBI Uniform Crime Report indicate that there was a sharp increase in violent crimes, Aggravated Assault, Robbery and Rape reported in the Indianapolis metro area between the years 2000 and 2005.
Traffic Tickets Can Cost more than just money
Without a good lawyer to help with your traffic ticket you could pay more than you think.
Indiana Criminal Defense Lawyer
Indiana Criminal Defense Lawyer